Horses caretaker speaks out Save Email Print
Posted: 5:07 PM Mar 27, 2008
Last Updated: 5:22 PM Mar 27, 2008
Reporter: Emi FitzGerald
Email Address: emi.fitzgerald@kxii.com

A | A | A

WHITESBORO, TX -- The caretaker of hundreds of horses speaks out. He says a You Tube video showing skinny horses does not tell the whole story. More than 200 horses were removed from the property recently because of bank repossession. But the man taking care of the horses say they weren't his.

"There was never a time these horses didn't have hay in front of them,” says Sam Houston, a Whitesboro rancher.

He is referring to hundreds of horses, left abandoned on his property last fall. Since then he has spent about $50,000 on hay and other feed.

"I care about animals,” he says. “I've always cared about animals and certainly have put my money where my mouth is and have spent a great deal of time and money trying to take care of these animals so to be vilified is pretty tough to take."

A video recently posted on the website You Tube shows about twenty of the horses with visible hips and bones. He says the animals were in poor condition but it was because of illness, not neglect.

While he did care for the horses, they never belonged to him. They were the property of Houston Ranch, but have since been repossessed by an area bank. Sam is a former employee, but no longer has any affiliation with Houston Ranch. He has never had any ownership with the ranch. The “Houston” last name is a coincidence.

He says he separated the sickly horses from the rest of the healthy ones, making sure they had adequate food.

"This is just something that happens if you have a large herd of horses,” says Jim Babcock, a Whitesboro rancher, well-respected in the quarter-horse community. “You're going to have some sick ones but these are not Sam's horses."

Since the You Tube video circulated online, Sam says he has received several e-mails accusing him of abuse and neglect. The SPCA and Grayson County Sheriff's Office both determined the horses were not mistreated.

"As long as the animals have food and water, basically that's all the state requires," says Lt. Linda Draper with the Sheriff’s Office. Lt. Draper also owns several horses and is familiar with proper care.

“Not many people are going to take on 200 animals especially horses to feed them out of his own pocket. That doesn't happen today," Babcock says.

The horses have been removed to a private ranch somewhere in the Tioga area where are receiving care.

More Stories
Body found on Byng school campus

Local Republicans react to RNC

New building inspection laws make for safer Texas homes

Ragweed blooms in Texoma

Carter Co. looking for people who have unpaid property taxes

Bonham shelter ready for any incoming evacuees

City leaders to put Sulphur name change issue on November ballot

Student food drive in Ardmore

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Ananyomous Location: Southwest on Apr 29, 2008 at 02:22 PM
I've had one business dealing (bred my mare to one of the stallions he managed)with Sam Houston and he took advantage of me. Now I still have to resolve registration issues because of this bankruptcy. The horse industry is full of nice people and flakes. There's lots of choices so I suppose that both Sam Houston and Babcock are two to stay away from. By the way, Sam Houston represented himself as the owner of the ranch to me. I'm an experienced breeder so I know his behavior was not typical of the good people out there, but the flakey version.

Posted by: Faron on Mar 30, 2008 at 01:23 PM
I personally know the individual that found, moved, and videoed these horses, Sam Houston is not the hero here, he is the culprit, and is solely responsible for the way these horses were treated. There is no excuse for this, hay is cheap, and if in fact Sam did pay $50,000 of his own money to care for the horses, then why did this happen? The horses were removed from properties owned or leased by Mr. Houston. Greg from Oklahoma is correct in his comments about Sam's reputation in the horse industry. What he failed to mention is that Sam is also a disbarred attorney, which should also make you question his credibility and his statements pertaining to this situation. I also know that Jim Babcock and Sam Houston were at one time business partners. The horse industry deserves the whole story, not just one side of it, the fact that Sam Houston lied (a fact that you have been made aware of)about his involvement in the Houston Ranch should be the first red flag.

Posted by: Greg Location: Oklahoma on Mar 29, 2008 at 06:24 PM
Sam Houston is not the victim here, the horses that he was supposed to care for are. Mr. Houston has a reputation of poor horse care and questionable ethics in the horse industry. Sam has claimed ownership of the Houston Ranch for several years, there are numerous articles and advertisments to prove it. These horses were removed by Sam to a property that was leased by him yet he chose not to care for them. You owe it to the public to investigate this situation beyond what claims Sam Houston and Jim Babcock make, these men are busimess partners and both stand to lose a lot if Mr. Houston is found negligent. The entire horse industry is in an uproar not only because of this situation, but the way Mr. Houston was portrayed by your newscast as a victim, he is not, what he is is a liar, proven when he claimed he was only an employee and when he stated he wanted what was best for these horses. This is a sad situation that has given the industry as a whole a black eye. Do your job.

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:43 AM
I know you got proof that Sam was claiming ownership of Houston Ranch before this video was posted, because I emailed it to you. PLease dont let this end here lets get some more video of the other 180 horses so we can know who the real victim is.

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:39 AM
Television is a great tool to sway public opinion. You did a great job making sure that at least people that do not know the facts will think Sam is a hero. Here is just one quick example of the lies you reported. Sam WAS claiming to be the owner of Houston Ranch until it no longer suited him. Now if you want to do some real reporting get video,s of the other 180 horses that he claims to have fed, and find out why he is no longer claiming to own Houston Ranch.

Posted by: Colton Location: whitesboro on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:05 PM
why would someone take 200 horses from the old houstan ranch when they were perfectly fine where they were? all the horses in the youtube video were skin and bones why were they not treated?, so where are all the others? the horses in the video had the houstan ranch brand and he said they were not his but if they arent his then why would you put $50,000 when your business has gone bankrupt. i beleive there is another side to the story that may come out someday

Posted by: anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 07:11 PM
Give me a break. Sick or not, these horses were underfed and neglected. Don't believe the bs about coincidental name. His former girlfriend owns the ranch; they split so the business split and that is why he says they were not his. He ran the ranch as his own, just wasn't fortunate enough to have the $ to be the owner.

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 12:59 PM
yes 20 horses is ten percent of the horses were sick. THis is not a great amount of animals. Yes it is sad if one horse is sick but the rest of the animals were health and fit so if they were all recieving the same care then he must of done something right

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 12:28 PM
For some reason i though the article said 100 horses! 200 horses wow and only less than 20 were sick. He is obviously not being cruel or neglecting anything. The person who posted the video on you tube just wanted to get attention and look good, hopefully karma will come back to you.

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Wild horse's that GRAZE pastures !only! should only require grass, hay and water. A woking horse will get the grain because they are used more and need it. If a horse is sick of course they will lose weight. And when you lose that much weight it's hard to put it back on. They aren't like human's you have to slowly get there weight back on them, a horse should never be over enduldged that's not how it works. Feeding 100 horses is very costly, 50,000 sound's like alot but most of you have probally never bought hay or have any idea how much it take's to feed a herd like that. Hat's off to this man who helped them. There were 100 horses and only about 20 were ill It happens.

Posted by: Rachel Location: Denison on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Who among us could care for 200 horses out of our own pocket that didn't belong to us? Sometimes you can do everything right and horses just don't look good. Maybe because of teeth, age, overall health, worms... the list goes on and on. I've had horses for 20 years and done my share of rescue projects. Horses can drop to a poor condition in less than 45 days and it can take 90-120 for them to start to recover. My suggestion - don't just gripe take action - adopt or purchase a needed animal and care for it.

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Disease such as somach ulcers or teeth trouble will cause horses to loose weight or have trouble keeping it on. People for get that horses are not made to eat grain they are grass eaters they graze and eat forage. Most horse that just sit in the pasture do well eating hay and grass. The grain only acts as a supplement when they are being worked. Horses still survive to day in the wild without humans pouring grain to them. This man did a deed to help these animals by giving an out of pocket expense. In todays society that says a lot where most people look at it as it is not mine so what do I care. I hope that you that are so outspoken about this have had some ranch experience with more than one backyard pet horse

Posted by: adam Location: whitesboro on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:59 AM
abandonned horses or hidden horses that is the question. Was the $50,000 spent on feed real or imaginary money and was it embezzeled from businness that caries the accussed's name (Sam Houston).

Posted by: Anonymous Location: Madill,Ok on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:22 AM
This man was just doing a good Deed! Its hard to find ppl like this these days~

Posted by: Pam Location: Sherman on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:17 AM
My hat is off to you Sam. You have spent an enormous amount of money to care for these animals. Unfortunately, we live in a world where some take a small amount of information and create there own version of the truth. You're a good man!

Posted by: Lydia Location: Legg on Mar 28, 2008 at 07:00 AM
I sure hope they receive better care and feed, horses need more than feed and water to survive. I do hope this station does a follow up on them to see just how rapidly these horses gain weight when properly being taken care of. I would like to know what sickness these animals were treated for to be this skinny.

Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Can we see a video of the other 180 horses what kind of shape are they in? Hay and water is all that is required by the ASPCA? We treat criminals better than that?

Posted by: ra Location: tx on Mar 27, 2008 at 06:44 PM
While the internet can be a great resource to get information, people need to be mindful to get the facts before posting information that can harm someone. Kudos to Mr. Houston for taking care of the horses.

AP Video on KXII
KXII's Summer Lake Photo Contest!