Hydroelectric power created at Denison Dam Save Email Print
Posted: 10:50 PM May 15, 2008
Last Updated: 11:28 AM May 16, 2008
Reporter: Mystic Matthews
Email Address: mystic.matthews@kxii.com

A | A | A

DENISON, Tex. - Electricity can come from a number of sources, but officials say we are fortunate to have a clean renewable source right here in Texoma.

The Denison Dam produces hydro electric power just about everyday. Mystic Matthews investigates how much is generated and where it ends up.

"We are very lucky to have it. Several lakes in Tulsa district have hydroelectric power. But we are very fortunate to have it," says Joe Custer, the Texoma Lake Manager.

Hydroelectric power is a clean-burning, renewable energy source, and it’s made right here at the Denison Dam.

Something Denison resident Michael Tingle says we should be using more of. "The fact that it's here and it’s renewable.”

Custer says we only have two units producing power at the dam, “Approximately 11,000 cubic feet per second is running from two units at 40 megawatts per unit."

And that's with the flood gates shut.

"Flood gates are used for large releases during a flood or high water situations. Right now the only release is through the generation units.”

With those units producing 80 megawatts of power, “One megawatt will typically operate 1000 Midwestern homes; one megawatt is 1,000 homes. 40 megawatts is 40,000 homes. So today's generation is 80,000 homes."

That's a lot of power. "Yes, that is a lot of power, but its only peak power. Our power is not stored. You cannot store hydroelectric power. As we create it, its being used somewhere across the grid," says Custer.

But he says there are disadvantages to hydro electric power.

"The availability of water and the costs to build a dam in today’s environment is one or two drawbacks to hydroelectric."

But Tingle says it’s worth it, “Being a renewable source, it’s what we need to be doing."

And Custer agrees. So for now, the dam will continue to create what the power company needs.

And if the demand for hydro electricity goes up, “More units could be added in the future if demand necessitates."

Custer also told me all power that is generated at the Denison Dam goes to a company called AEP.

But the power only goes to customers they service in Texas.

More Stories
DTV Transition: KXII-TV off the air temporarily

Annual museum "Boo Run" a success

Former Garvin County man's murder conviction overturned

Ada kidnapping a joke, Trooper's cruiser totaled in crash

Honey Grove students help Ike victims

New program in Texas aims to keep uninsured drivers off the road

Motorcycle accident in Sherman

Golfers raise money for Children’s Advocacy Center

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Marty Location: Gordonville on May 17, 2008 at 11:35 AM
My comments specifically qualified generation during high water periods. Highwater should mean above 617. I am totally against generation that brings the lake level below safe lake levels for recreational use of the lake.

Posted by: gravity Location: downstream on May 16, 2008 at 03:16 PM
if "they" took the water further downstream, the water would have to be pumped Up Hill. The electricity goes into "the grid." There's not a separate set of wires running to South Texas. AEP just gets dibs on that amount of the general electric output in the system when generation is going. Renewable seems great, but what will we do when the water's low and the winds not blowing? We still must have backup capacity in on-demand generation. More generation capacity would encourage higher winter levels for storage, lower summer levels to keep peak season generation going. Be careful what you wish for.

Posted by: Concerned Location: Colbert on May 16, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Marty, you are right on. It really bothers me to see what energy is wasted during every high water event. It also makes me question why they take water, for customers south of here, upstream from the dam? Would it not make more sense to pump it after it produced electricity in the turbines? This type of revenue is everywhere, if our government officials would just look.

Posted by: Marty Location: Gordonville on May 16, 2008 at 11:42 AM
The dam was designed & built to house 4 turbines, but only 2 were ever installed. Think of the additional power that could have been generated during our high water periods, when the flood gates just let it spill wasted down stream. Instead the power companies consume oil & natural gas to generate electricity, further driving up the cost of those commodities for the rest of us. The government could have been doubling its sales of electicity, finding additional sources of revenue , versus just collecting more taxes from us. The government needs to focus on optimal use of our renewable resources, install 2 additonal turbines, & maximize power generation during high water periods.

Posted by: Sparky Location: Sherman on May 16, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Yes, it's great that we have a source of clean renewable energy right here in our own back yards. BUT - THAT ENERGY IS NOT USED BY ANYONE ANYWHERE NEAR HERE! The article says that ALL of the energy produced goes to AEP for it's Texas customers. According to the www.aeptexas.com website "AEP Texas is connected to and serves more than 900,000 electric consumers in the deregulated Texas marketplace. It's headquartered in Corpus Christi, with regulatory and external affairs offices in Austin. Major cities served include Corpus Christi, Abilene, McAllen, Harlingen, San Angelo, Vernon, Victoria and Laredo. As an energy delivery (wires) company, AEP Texas delivers electricity safely and reliably to homes, businesses and industry across its nearly 100,000 square mile service territory in south and west Texas." The electricity produced here is sent along high-powered transmission lines all the way across the state to the very southern tip and western edges of Texas. Hmmm.

Posted by: Richie Location: Sherman on May 15, 2008 at 10:56 PM
More dams and hydroelectric plants would be great, but the NIMBY's and environmentalists would stand in the way. Can't disturb the mating grounds of the spotted beaver, or whatever :(

AP Video on KXII