Explicit book pulled from middle school library in Marietta Save Email Print
Posted: 6:22 PM Sep 2, 2008
 Last Updated: 6:36 PM Sep 2, 2008
 Reporter: Robin Beal
Email Address: robin.beal@kxii.com
108 comments
A | A | A

MARIETTA, Okla. -- A Love County parent is outraged after her young daughter brings home a book so graphic, we can't even repeat some of the dialogue on television.

Parents are usually proud when their youngsters take the initiative to read a book, but when Kathy Davis' daughter brought home a novel she checked out from her middle school library, both mother and daughter, were shocked by what was inside.

"She just told me, ‘Mom, it's gross,’" Kathy Davis told us.

Graphic descriptions of oral sex are detailed in passages discussing recreational drug use. What is even more shocking -- a question in class about how many calories a tablespoon of a certain bodily fluid contains, all in the pages of a book, aimed at young adults.

"It’s, it's awful... It's... I can't believe... I don't talk about that in front of my child -- and I don't expect it to be in a book that she can get from the library. I mean it's just... I'm speechless."

Kathy Davis was shocked when she saw what her 13-year-old daughter was reading. Innocent looking enough from the outside, the neon green cover is eye-catching, but the words on the pages inside reveal some very adult discussions.

"It’s nasty -- it's soft porn. As far as I have read -- if it was a movie, she couldn't go see it."

The book -- "TTFN" -- came from the Marietta Middle School library, and what's more -- it was on an advanced reading list worth eight points to any student who checks it out and reads it.

The book is recommended for older students, grades ten through twelve, and is written in "instant message" style, depicting online conversations between three fictional eleventh grade girls.

"She read page 32 to me and that was the end of the book. I took it away from my daughter and I can't believe they have these things, this type of reading in a middle school," Kathy Davis said.

That book, which does contain crude references to fellatio and other sexually explicit innuendo, has now been pulled from the shelves here at Marietta Middle School.

As far as how that book got there in the first place, and ended up on a recommended reading list, we don't know. School administrators refused on camera interview, saying only the book is "no longer available".

Ms. Davis she says this should serve as a warning to all parents to know what your child is reading.
More Stories
Bank links over 400 identity theft cases to Gainesville restaurant

Sherman revises budget after losing lawsuit

Ada hospital receives anonymous $1 million donation

Safe Family: Baby formula warning

 Most Texoma counties under burn bans

Sherman school board meets to discuss budget cuts

Man charged with DUI, manslaughter in Ada wreck that killed Okla. woman

International dignitaries visit Ardmore’s Noble Foundation
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Melissa Location: Marietta on Sep 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Does anyone realize that kids these days start doing the things that are mentioned in this book at age 10 and 11? Maybe all of you should let your kids read it and then discuss it with them. That is a good way to start the conversation about drugs and sex. NOOOO instead you call the news and make a big deal about it. Get over it. They are learning these kinds of things in 5th and 6th grades these days.
Posted by: Liberal Librarian Location: Oklahoma on Sep 15, 2008 at 09:13 PM
Concerned Parent from Oh MY! I never once said that the book "TTFN" was "okay" for Middle School students. I stated, in defense of the M.I.S. librarian's decision to purchase the book, that the book fell within the guidelines of most school districts' selection policy. I did not deny that the book might need to be removed from the shelf; however, the removal should only be permanent after the proper reconsideration forms have been filed according to the guidelines of the same selection policy. The parents and the students of the school where I work do not need to fear the books that I place on the shelves. All are purchased according to policy, and I know that my administration will properly back our districts selection policy if a book is contested.
Posted by: Local Teen Location: Nunya on Sep 11, 2008 at 02:19 PM
"Not Shocked," sshhhhhhh. Quit giving away our secrets.
Posted by: Not Shocked At All Location: Hiding from your teens on Sep 10, 2008 at 03:05 PM
It's one thing for an adult to walk up to a teenager and discuss the matters in this book. But if you parents *really* knew what your high schoolers were talking about on the Internet, much less with your friends, you'd be shocked. The book TTFN is pretty mild compared to that. I mean, you could be Vice President of the United States and your little born-again Christian, homeschooled daughter could be reading a naughty book or out having ... UNPROTECTED SEX!!
Posted by: OOTO Location: Texoma on Sep 9, 2008 at 02:59 PM
Paige, you little minx you! Sorry to break your heart, but I am already taken. If something happens with that, though, I will be sure to let you know. Opinionated; however did you come to choose a screen name like that????
Posted by: Opinionated Location: Ardmore on Sep 9, 2008 at 07:27 AM
I was a junior in high school, and we had to get a permission slip to read "To Kill a Mockingbird". Today's society is going into the crapper with liberals leading the way. What happened to teaching your children good moral values and teaching them by example.
Posted by: Paige on Sep 8, 2008 at 04:57 PM
OOTO in you're dreams. I don't think anyone in the right mind would want to, "fall for you."
Posted by: Leroy Location: Sherman on Sep 8, 2008 at 04:06 PM
I bet some of you parents who don't think this book belongs in your schools library would be shocked to know about a "childrens" book that's been out for years called "Rainbow Party". Probably been read by every teen out there. Available at libraries and book stores everywhere.
Posted by: Fozzy Location: Ardmore on Sep 8, 2008 at 01:52 PM
The Librarians job is to keep the library orderly and in sync with the Dewey decimal system and to serve the people who are there who may need help finding things and of course to check out the books that people want to read. They should NEVER limit or judge what someone reads. Controlling what people read is something that in no way falls on the librarian. If you as a parent want to know what is being read or have standards of what you will let your precious little snowflake read, then maybe you need to do your job better and leave everyone else alone.
Posted by: OOTO Location: Texoma on Sep 8, 2008 at 01:19 PM
Anonymous Location: Sherman on Sep 8, 2008 at 12:28 PM When you have as many as 100 different titles arriving at one time, do you really think one person is going to sit down and read them all??
Posted by: Anonymous Location: Sherman on Sep 8, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Fozzy, it is the librarians responsibilty to look through the books when they order them before the kids check them out
Posted by: OOTO Location: Texoma on Sep 8, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Everyone! Mark this date on your calendars!! I agree with Fozzy!
Posted by: Fozzy Location: Ardmore on Sep 8, 2008 at 09:47 AM
Concerned parents ought to be screening what their children are reading and not blaming librarians who do not check the books out. Once again the parents get caught sleeping at the the switch and want to blame others.
Posted by: Judge on Sep 8, 2008 at 07:48 AM
Hey Mork's daddy (btw you stole my character), I hope you feel ashamed for spawning the demon seed that we all know as Mork. That fateful night that you mated with a chupacabra to produce the most unfunny character in Texoma will live in infamy. You, sir, created a monster.
Posted by: Tolerant Location: Oklahoma on Sep 7, 2008 at 10:20 PM
Why does it matter if everybody involved was a Christian or not? This is a free country.
Posted by: Concerned parent Location: OH MY! on Sep 7, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Liberal Librarian, if you are a Librarian, then I think the parents in the area deserve to know who you are and what school system you work for. You seem pretty proud of your remarks, so please inform the readers of your name and the school which employees you. If you think this book is o.k. for Middle School children to be reading, then I think your school is in big trouble! I also think these parents deserve to know, so they can take extra measures to check out what books YOU are placing in their childrens LIBRARY!
Posted by: Mork's Daddy Location: Texoma on Sep 6, 2008 at 01:14 PM
Judge - it's called satire - the fact is a very small group of you just don't get it (but most of the readers do.) You're too uptight and you need to increase your bran intake. If you really think coming on a local news website forum is going to increase your credability as a person or people will think you're some kind of intellect you missed the boat Skipper. You can't shame or hurt Morks feelings because he's a fictional character. Actually your replies ARE funnier than Morks'. Mr. T said is so well - "I pity the FOOL." I will personally speak to Mork (I have magic powers to speak to such things like fictional characters) and see if I can control him but it's hard to control someone that is not real. As far as the book in the library? I take responability for my children and their knowledge of such things. They have never been convicted of a crime and are strong in their faith. This is not even a real issue, their are so many things that are much more important. HAGD :)
Posted by: A Liberal Librarian Location: Oklahoma believe it or not! on Sep 6, 2008 at 01:04 PM
It's my understanding that the parent did indeed go to the principal with the book and was told that the book would be removed immediately. If so.... Shame on the mother for taking it one step further by going to the news station. You had accomplished your goal of having the book removed, so what did you expect to gain from this? Oh yeah! You were on TV!!! Shame on KXII for making a mountain out of a mole hill! Parents have daily complaints about the educational system including the books provided, but is that really news worthy? Shame on the principal of the school for allowing one parent to decide for everyone what children should read? This particular book fits into the guidelines of the selection policy we use at my library, and unless the mother filled out the necessary forms for reconsideration, the book should have remained on the shelf. If she did, it should have been removed temporarily until a committee made the decision. I am a Christian, but do not believe in censorship!
Posted by: my opinion Location: sherman on Sep 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM
Things were much better when we read stories from Uncle Remus. Bring back Song of The South & Inkie and the Myna Bird cartoons. Little Black Sambo. Talk about shock and awe. Rap music is worse than any of the above mentioned cartoons or books but they are banned. What a bunch of Nazi's we've become.
Posted by: kelly on Sep 6, 2008 at 10:45 AM
sounds like republican is a true blue republican..just start firing people whether it is their fault or not..kill em all,,let god sort them out,,,huh republican??
Posted by: mom Location: ok on Sep 6, 2008 at 09:07 AM
I send my children to school to learn the 3 r's - reading, writing, and arithmetic! I don't send them to school to learn sex moves and how to use drugs! I'm tired of reading your comments saying parents don't teach their children about sex, so they should learn about it in school. Frankly, it's no one's business how I feel about teaching sex ed to my own children. I will handle the topic in a way I feel fit. The schools are in place to teach our children to read and write, and personal issues are to be handled at home. If some parents are not talking to their kids about sex, then that's not the schools concern. My daughter has known a few girls that got pregnant while in their junior and senior years of school, and who do you think stood by them? I assure you it was not the school, it was their families! I don't think supplying these girls with "HOW TO" books in the school library would have prevented anything. It's just a sick writer preying on young people to make a buck!
Posted by: anon Location: tx on Sep 5, 2008 at 09:37 PM
How would you people feel if your 7th grader was standing on the street and a perfect stranger walked up and handed them a cute envelope decorated to get their interest, and inside was a note describing sex acts and drug usage? I'll bet you would call the cops on this person! So, please explain how you think it's o.k. for a perfect stranger to write a book, decorate the cover to appeal to children, write about sex acts and drug usage and put it in our middle school libraries?!
Posted by: west Location: good ol' USA on Sep 5, 2008 at 06:43 PM
"People who are easily shocked should be shocked more often." -Mae West
Posted by: Jennifer Location: Parenthood on Sep 5, 2008 at 06:20 PM
Obviously the librarian did not personally select the book and place it specifically to bring corruption to the young people of Marietta. Kids are going to hear about things, some things that are really bad, and it's unfortunate. If parents consider ANY subject to be off the table for discussion with their children, they might just as well deal with the fact that their children will be educated on the matter by other ill-informed children, and inappropriate material. Subjects that are taboo are far more interesting to our childrens curious minds. Again, not rocket science. Be a parent, even when it's uncomfortable. Don't blame innocent people for ugliness in the world. I find it difficult to believe that this has become such a huge ordeal.
Posted by: Democrat in Marietta Location: Love County on Sep 5, 2008 at 05:30 PM
Mr/Mrs/Ms Republican in Ardmore: As an educator in a local school who interacts with middle and high school children daily, I don't find the book "dirty." It's actually a accurate portrayal of our youth of today. They spend a great deal of time conversing with peers via internet chat, and we are all hiding our heads in sand if we do not believe teen girls discuss sex, on or off the world wide web.
Posted by: AL Location: SW OK on Sep 5, 2008 at 04:18 PM
rp said "but do you think normal parents, and when I say normal I mean parents that are not sick in the head will find it appropriate to sit down and describe the acts they are referring to in this book?" Umm...yeah, normal parents would discuss this. In discussing sex with your child, it would behoove a parent to discuss not just intercourse, but those things that lead up to sex. To explain to your child about oral sex and peer pressure, i.e. the belief that oral sex isn't really sex. To discuss oral sex in conjunction with sexually transmitted diseases. What you imply is way over the top and just plain ignorant. I find it funny that many of the commenters that object to this book can't even type the words oral sex! Personally, I feel the book didn't belong in the middle school library. Its target audience is 10-12th graders so it would have been more appropriate at the high school library.
Posted by: Judge on Sep 5, 2008 at 03:23 PM
Mork, the more I think of it your alien name is fitting cause you live in another world. Nice job putting down your own family. Classy move there. You are the type that will do anything for a laugh. The problem is that you are rarely funny. You hit on one out of every 9 or 10 you throw out there and that is bad. Even a broken clock gets it right twice a day.
Posted by: Mother of a Teen Location: Southern Oklahoma on Sep 5, 2008 at 02:24 PM
TTFN is "internet chat lingo" and "text message lingo" for Ta Ta For Now. This book is written in the form of internet chat messages between three young girls.
Posted by: Republican in Ardmore Location: Ardmore on Sep 5, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Democrat from Marietta, don't leave your dirty book lying around where the kids can find it! And tell that to you friend Bubba Clinton too!
Posted by: Mork Location: Ork on Sep 5, 2008 at 01:38 PM
Hey Judge, if you think that's scary you should see my wife and kids! OMG - What have I done?! Back to the title of this book - what does "ttfn" mean? Anything to do with a "Vagoon" or "Mud Shark". Just trying to keep expanding my vocabulary - hope I spelled that right :) Where my spray paint?
Posted by: Democrat from Marietta Location: Love County on Sep 5, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Leave it to a Republican to suggest the immediate firing of a principal (note spelling) and librarian simply because ONE parent did not agree with the content of ONE book.
Posted by: Judge on Sep 5, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Mork is that supposed to be cute or funny? What the #$%^ is that? Do you think you can just throw illogical sentences together and expect us to think it is clever? Pull my finger? Take some advice please. Get help. I don't know what is going on in that spray paint fumes infested peanut brain of yours but it is just scary.
Posted by: OOTO Location: Texoma on Sep 5, 2008 at 08:43 AM
Watch it there Paige, I think you are starting to fall for me!
Posted by: Mork Location: Ork on Sep 5, 2008 at 07:50 AM
I forgot, I don't have a coffee table - dad gummit. Hey, can someone help me out? I need you to pull my finger (BAM!) Now, what were we talking about? I'm out - love, peace, & chicken grease - chabatta (where's my whiskey?)
Posted by: Republican in Ardmore Location: Ardmore on Sep 5, 2008 at 03:52 AM
The Principle and the librarian should be fired for letting this trash into the school!
Posted by: lc Location: grayson county on Sep 4, 2008 at 11:22 PM
Unbelievable! We all care about this much as much as our presidential election according to our postings. Raise your kiddos to be open-minded and talk to them about issues. One book is not going to turn your children into bad people. I hope that the mother of that 13 year old has the sense to explain why she believes the content is inappropriate, not just that it is soft porn! They air much more explicit material in some family-driven sitcoms and movies. And as an aside, every pre-teen and teen that knows about this story is ready to read the book that everyone is talking about. I say KXII did a great service to the area first by boosting readers' interests (reading is a great way to increase intelligence levels), and maybe by opening some parents' eyes.
Posted by: Paige on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:34 PM
Oh wait, O.O.T.O, you're obsessed with yourself. L.O.L. I forgot to type it, "properly".
Posted by: "Mork Hater" Location: Grayson County on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:42 PM
I purposefully try to avoid comments made from "Mork from Ork, the Dork" but I was engrossed with other folks' comments about this matter & accidentally read Mork's comments. Man, I feel stupid. Mork - Please get a life. You don't always have to try and be the center of attention. Don't you have a job or something? Maybe Kids? A hobby? Something???
Posted by: Paige Location: Texoma on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:23 PM
OOTO your obsessed with yourself lol
Posted by: Amanda on Sep 4, 2008 at 04:03 PM
I agree that parents need to more involved with their children. But it also makes it hard when your also trying to make ends meat. I understand that these children see things on tv and hear it on the radio but this is a very detailed book and I don't think that a 13 year old knows all the stuff that goes on in the book. And it's not just rap that talks about sex, drugs. Remember alot of the music the parents now grew upto talked about drugs and sex as well.
Posted by: YA Librarian Location: Connecticut on Sep 4, 2008 at 03:20 PM
I think if this mother does not think these things are discussed at school she is naive. On the other hand, as a teen librarian I must say that I would not recommend this for middle schoolers. It is more suited to high school.
Posted by: OOTO Location: Texoma on Sep 4, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Matthew, while I agree with your sentiments as a rule, please don't confuse "Christian values" with "fundamentalist redneck puritanical head in the sand" values.
Posted by: Mork's Location: Father on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:52 PM
Mork, I thought I told you to get off the computer and do your homework. You cannot expect to pass the 6th grade if you don't study your spelling words.
Posted by: WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU? on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:43 PM
ANYONE WHO THINKS A BOOK GIVING "GRAPHIC DESCRIPTIONS OF ORAL SEX AND DRUG USE" SHOULD BE IN A MIDDLE SCHOOL LIBRARY IS SICK IN THE HEAD AND CRAZY!
Posted by: Another Local Librarian Location: Southern Oklahoma on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:09 PM
Thanks to Kathy Davis and KXII boy wonder Robin Beal for making "TTFN" by Lauren Myracle the most requested teen book in the area.
Posted by: KXII Viewer Location: Oklahoma on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:55 PM
We can all be upset with the school, the young girl's mother, the author of the book, or even the publisher, but in my opinion, the news station had no right airing such a story. It must have been a slow news day! Books are challenged in libraries every day and it goes unnoticed. Can I make it on the evening news just because I didn't like what they are serving at the local burger shop?
Posted by: Matthew Location: Everywhere on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:50 PM
You people really need to wake up! Guess what? Your children talk like this and already know about sexual matters. One of the biggest problems in this country is the puritanical, unhealthy obsession with repressing talk about sexualtiy. Sex is healthy and natural. Why do you think they have so many less problems with teen pregnancy and rape in Europe? Because they talk about sex and are not afraid of it. These so-called 'Christian Values' are what is destroying this country. I am so thankful that my children will not be raised in such a close-minded backward place as Marietta.
Posted by: Mork's Location: Daddy on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:29 PM
Mork, I told you to get off the computer and do your homework. You cannot expect to pass the 6th grade if you don't do your studying. Don't forget, you are still grounded for the male nudey magazine I found under your bed.
Posted by: Mindy Location: Planet Earth on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Mork, please do us all a favor and go back to Ork. You're such a moron.
Posted by: Judge on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Mork I am surprised you haven't already read it since you loiter in that middle school library crusing for chicks.
Posted by: Mork Location: Ork on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Heck, most of the kids in school can't read anyway - what's all the fuss about? Does it have pictures? Where can I get a copy? Might make a nice coffee table book for my double wide.
Posted by: Marietta Alumni Location: Oklahoma on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:22 AM
As a proud graduate of Marietta High School, I am appalled and embarrassed by the quick removal of the book by the school administration. When I attended school at MHS, I was taught to follow proper procedures and to champion that which is right. To allow one mother's opinion to deny other students the right to read a book is wrong. Let a committee make the decision if the book should be returned to the shelves. My vote would be YES!
Posted by: MM on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:01 AM
You people are ignorant saying its just rap music. I do believe there's rock music talking about sex and doesn't carrie underwood sing about having a one night stand and not even knowing his name cuz she got so drunk. So i guess ya'll need to stop your children from listening to all music. Oh except for the parent that only lets the kids listen to KLTY cuz thats what all kids want to listen too. (Sarcasm)
Posted by: D Location: Texas on Sep 4, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Why not require parental permission on this type book? I do find it interesting that while most health books used in the Texas don’t even have the word condom in it, the libraries may very well have this book. Of course it is first and foremost the parent’s responsibility to educate their children on sexual issues. If you are one of those parents that think not my 13 year old, wake up. They say and hear much worse every day at school and online and at younger ages than 13. Ask your kids, you may be surprised if you haven't discussed it before. Personally, I made it clear to both of my sons that if they had any questions about anything, ask me. I left the subject open they have come to me as they heard things and we have talked about it. The result? Drug free good kids that know the reasons to wait for sex and how to protect themselves if they don’t
Posted by: EducatorToo Location: Ardmore on Sep 4, 2008 at 09:52 AM
I am a former middle school teacher who taught English. I was given a recommended reading list at the beginning of every school year. When I asked why I, as the students' teacher, had no input into that list, I was told the list was already decided by a committee and that I was required to follow it. On one occasion I was told that even though a certain book was on the list, I was to instruct my students to not check it out. I objected to that policy, telling administrators that if a book was not to be read, then it should not be in the library. To answer another point brought up on this board, teachers and schools are supposed to be a moral compass to students and the community. That is a basic point that is taught, as far as I know, in every university education class. It is not our job to take the place of parents, but it is our job to set a good example.
Posted by: rp Location: Calera on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:41 AM
Who said the school is supposed to raise our children? I don't think most good parents feel that the school system should raise their children and I do believe parents should provide their children with information about sex and protection from disease and early pregnancy, but do you think normal parents, and when I say normal I mean parents that are not sick in the head will find it appropriate to sit down and describe the acts they are referring to in this book?
Posted by: rp Location: Calera on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:07 AM
Educator- Maybe you need to brush up on your comprehension also. I don't believe my first blog implied in anyway that I expect the public school system to raise my children. I do however believe that they have a moral responsability to make sure the books they are reading are at their level. The book in question sounds like it is something that doesn't need to be in the hands of an adult much less a junior high student. You have a good day.
Posted by: FORMER MARIETTA STUDENT Location: OK on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:01 AM
I know that the Principal had to be totally shocked at the book. He was my teacher and I know that he is a good Christian man with high morals and family values. Most teachers at Marietta Public Schools are. I believe the main problem with the situation is the way it was handled. It always happens there; people do not follow the proper procedures and do anything to get the press involved. Parents should be in all parts of their child's life. But as parents they also need to teach their children that screaming and making a scene is not the way to handle things. You need to have some self respect and act like an adult and talk to people first. Resolve issues not create more. MOM YOU SHOULD HAVE GONE TO THE SCHOOL FIRST.
Posted by: Mom Location: Country on Sep 4, 2008 at 07:10 AM
I bought one of these series of books for my daughter. I did not read it until this story came out. I'm sorry to all you parents who think this book is vulger. But, this is real life circumstances that our children face every day. Through this book, they are seeing how events play out in these circumstances. Teenagers do not share all their secrets with their parents. I know mine don't. I just hope they make the right decisions when some of these events in these books happen to them. I am hoping my daughter learns from these books the right and wrong way to handle situations. They cover such things as peer pressure, sexual advances, bullying and relationships with each other. I started reading Danielle Steele books in the 8th grade. Did they make me promiscuous, no. Did they help me deal with heartache and pain in my life, yes. Would my mother have approved of the books, no. We can not protect our children at all times. We have to hope that they will make the right decisions.
Posted by: lc Location: grayson county on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:52 PM
Give me a break. Any parent who thinks their 13 year old doesn't know about sex and other intimate acts needs to open their eyes. We are living in an advanced society where mass media allows children to grow up a little faster than we wish. If parents are concerned with someone else teaching there children about sex, then maybe they should sit down and talk with their children. It was not anyone's fault that the book was allowed to be checked out-it was simply a school trying to keep books fresh and timely. With the high rates of illiteracy and school drop-out rate, I give the school kudos for keeping students interested in any type of reading material! Again, to those who seem to be a little behind the times, maybe you need to go back to school and learn how to parent in the new millenium!
Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 3, 2008 at 09:31 PM
To: Unknown...Here, Why is it that some people are just "SUE HAPPY?" Why would this mother sue the school? I agree with most of the comments about being the parents responsibility to instill "moral" values in their children. It should not be left up to the school system. Now, with that being said. Yes, the school should have knowledge about what the books they order contain but, SUING IS NOT THE ANSWER...I am fairly sure your case would be laughed out of court if you filed it for this reason. Sheltering a child too much could cause them to rebel when they become of age and move out. Parents it is your responsibility to teach your children about sex and the outside world.
Posted by: Dookey Location: Shermboro on Sep 3, 2008 at 08:51 PM
I've heard worse watching 2 1/2 Men on CBS during prime time. They're always referencing sex of some sort. Hip-Hop has to be the worst, seeing how one of the top songs was "Lollipop". Now think about that one real hard!? I'm not advocating sensorship at all, just saying. Sure the book didn't belong in younger hands, but I wouldn't go around sueing anyone either. Heck, the world's coming to an end in 2012 anyway, according to those Myan's... so why worry about a little ol' book?
Posted by: Local Educator Location: Southern Oklahoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 07:43 PM
Marietta Parent: I believe the article probably mean "recommended reading list" NOT "required reading list." This book was recommended by many professional reviewing sources used by librarians when purchasing books. diana c.: I don't believe anyone "fell down" on their job. I'm sure the librarian in Marietta followed her school approved selection policy when the purchase of this book was made. As a somewhat liberal parent, I allowed my children to read a variety of materials while they were in middle and high school. I would hate to think that my children might have been denied their right to read a particular book because of one over zealous parent.
Posted by: concerned Location: texas on Sep 3, 2008 at 04:43 PM
You as a parent should be concerned about your child. The school systems didn't take your kids to raise. As parents we should educate our children on sex not keep them in a bubble. It's not the schools fault it's society.
Posted by: Yep Location: sherman on Sep 3, 2008 at 04:12 PM
"SO WHAT" Is right, I think it was bad but, why do people let kids listen to rap? I am sure if you would take time and listen to that trash you would not want them to listen to that. It's all about sex.
Posted by: Truth Will Out Location: Oklahoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 04:06 PM
Mom called the TV station and didn't meet with the principal until she could show up with a cameraman in tow. Does that speak to motive???
Posted by: JustFYI Location: Texoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Hmmmm. Page 32, where the "explicit" passage is one of the characters saying that she would never give a guy a (insert unmentionable act here), not even her future husband. (Had to go buy a copy) I commend mom for wanting to protect her daughter from mature things she isn't ready for---but where was the protection when mom made a spectacle of the situation? I hope the students know the girl isn't to be blamed. The poor girl!!!
Posted by: diana c Location: madill on Sep 3, 2008 at 03:33 PM
i'm just curious who call 12? This should have been handled a little more descretely, someone whoevers job is to scan those books fell down on the job..but i am embarrased it was on tv.
Posted by: Educator Location: Classroom on Sep 3, 2008 at 02:29 PM
rp, it is amazing, truly amazing, that you can get I don't think that a teacher should be "a good moral example," from my post. Might I suggest remedial reading so that you can work more on your comprehension. I said, and I quote, we "are not paid to be the moral police of our wards." I cannot decide what is morally appropriate for each of my students. That is for their parents to decide. Likewise, it is not appropriate for me to teach my morals to my students, as they may run counter to the wishes of different parents. What I am supposed to do, paid to do by the taxpayers is simple; impart knowledge and a love of learning. That is it! Nothing more.
Posted by: Gordo Location: The Ticket on Sep 3, 2008 at 01:35 PM
I wanna read that book real hard.
Posted by: Marietta Parent Location: Oklahoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 01:32 PM
What reading list are you talking about in the story? My child has never had a required reading list. What else is inaccurate about the story?
Posted by: Bill Clinton on Sep 3, 2008 at 01:16 PM
I was wondering where I left that book.
Posted by: Mom of two great kids! Location: Oklahoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Oh come on! The issue is the mother was offended. The student read the book through to then end, according to the article. I am sure she has been exposed to far worse if she has been at ballgames, on the internet or at the mall. No parent can remove every offensive object/subject from their child's life. The key to success in our house was to raise strong-minded children with a good hearts and values and let them decide "right and wrong"...it worked quite well.
Posted by: Resource Librarian Location: Oklahoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM
How appropriate that this "news story" comes just before the American Library Association's Banned Book Week. (September 27th to October 4th) ALA's Banned Book Week celebrates the freedom to choose or the freedom to express one’s opinion even if that opinion might be considered unorthodox or unpopular and stresses the importance of ensuring the availability of those unorthodox or unpopular viewpoints to all who wish to read them. After all, intellectual freedom can exist only where these two essential conditions are met.
Posted by: here Location: texas on Sep 3, 2008 at 12:26 PM
to Unknown @ here: Please do us ALL a favor and pull your child out of school. Maybe then YOU can claimthat YOU are doing the PARENTING!! Teaching/Learning starts AT HOME...YOU are souuposed to be ding YOUR job- parenting!! So quit blaming others- that's what's wrong with the whold country- no one wants to accept responsibility... when kids are old enough to get pregnant, or sire a child, then THEY are old enough to be making their own decisions- the PARENTS' job is to hlep them know how to make WISE decisions...You brought this child into the world, now it's up to YOU to teach how to make wise decisions.
Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 3, 2008 at 12:14 PM
"unknown" I really don't think I would sue the school, we as parents really need to know what our kids are reading now days, I cannot believe people on this comment board would want to discuss this stuff with their kids yes, there is things you need to tell them at a certain age but nothing in this book.
Posted by: Fozzy Location: Ardmore on Sep 3, 2008 at 12:06 PM
There should only be books full of happy things and happy thoughts... like the Bible Note: Sarcasm
Posted by: rp Location: Calera on Sep 3, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Educator- I know that it is the parents responible to be a good moral example for their children but parents can't be with their children at all times. And are you really going to set here an say that you don't think that it is an educator or teachers responsibility to be a good moral example for their students? If so you're probably one of the problems we have in the public school system.
Posted by: rp Location: Calera on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:29 AM
Trash like this is what is destroying the values and morals in this country. No person should be reading this trash not even adults. Year by year the corruption of this country gets worse. My Grandmother would roll over in her grave if she knew of some of the things that are read about in books and put on TV today. In another fifty years or so they will probably have hard core porn on TV and label it PG13, The mother in this situation should have notified the school first and maybe she did but maybe by it being broadcast by the news schools and parents will start paying closer attention to the books they are providing their students with.
Posted by: FORMER STUDENT Location: MARIETTA on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:23 AM
THIS DOES NOT SURPRISE ME!! AS A FORMER STUDENT AT MARIETTA I KWOW OF A LOT WORSE. SUCH AS, DRINKING ON SCHOOL TRIPS, TEACHERS SLEEPING IN CLASS, TEACHER SMOKING MARIJUANA, TEACHER STUDENT HANKY PANKY AT THE HOG PEN,AND TEACHER SAYING SHE DOESN'T CARE IF STUDENTS GRADUATE SHE JUST WANTS A PAY RAISE THESE THINGS ALL HAPPEN FROM LATE 80S TO THE MID 90S
Posted by: unknown Location: here on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM
NO WONDER WHY THERE ARE SO MANY GIRLS GETTING PREGNANT NOW A DAYS. NO WONDER WHY VIRGINITY IS BROKEN AT SUCH YOUNG AGES NOW A DAYS. THIS IS ENOUGH TO MAKE ME WANT TO PULL MY KID OUT OF SCHOOL AND HOME TEACH. THE GIRLS MOTHER SHOULD SUE THE "SCHOOL" (IF THAT'S WHAT YOU WOULD EVEN CALL IT.). NOW A DAYS "SCHOOL" IS NOT SCHOOL ANYMORE. IT'S MORE LIKE A PLACE WHERE KIDS LEARN ABOUT THE BIRDS AND THE BEES. I WOULD DEFINITELY SUE THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:21 AM
"Some What" my kids don't listen to rap they listen to 94.9 KLTY and they sure are not going to read books like this found in the library, you better get ahold of your schools and see what is in your libraries
Posted by: another school librarian Location: Oklahoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:15 AM
As a middle school librarian, my concern is for the Marietta librarian who was doing her job to the best of her ability. We do not have the time to read every page of ever book we purchase. When ordering books, we rely on such reviewing sources as "School Library Journal," "Publishers Weekly," "Kirkus Review," Horn Book," and "Booklist." All five of these professional sources gave this book favorable reviews. The only mention of explicit subject matter was: "There's some crude language as readers are drawn into the girls'intimate conversations, but the dialogue always rings true." Booklist (April 1, 2006) I also agree that one mother does not have the right to decide what all students should read. Others might view the book as an opportunity for their children to read and discuss such matters with their parents.
Posted by: Fozzy Location: Ardmore on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Why does it always have to go to instantly that extreme? Age appropriate reading materials is not book burning in the least... grow up!
Posted by: Truth Is on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:09 AM
This brings up several points. Primarily,the book should never have made it to the schools library.Secondly,rap music and a few other types are just as offensive.Additionally,the movies that kids and young adults are allowed to view are disgusting but many parents allow their kids to see them,often because they want to view them too and give in. We have got to take responsibility for our actions. It is frequently uncomfortable and many times unpopular,but we are not supposed to be popular-we are supposed to be responsible and a good steward of what we are entrusted with.
Posted by: Caring Mom/Old School Location: Grayson on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:01 AM
It's simple people, read or at least "read over" what your kids read. Learn the "new language" of texting, etc. BE INVOLVED with your kids' generation. IT'S CALLED PARENTING. Now, whether Mrs. Davis took the proper procedures or not, isn't really of significance to me. Books discussing types sex, etc. SHOULD NOT BE IN THE SCHOOLS!!!!! Those topics/books should be given to the kids by parents. Find it too difficult to talk to them, read this book and then decide for yourself if it will explain. If not, there are plenty of books written on the "teen level" out there.
Posted by: Educator Location: Classroom on Sep 3, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Educator, education, from the latin "ex duco," literally to lead. rp...has it ever dawned on you that the educators are leading children to information and knowledge? That is what they are paid to do. On the other hand, they are not paid to be the moral police of all of their wards. That is what their parents should be doing. Quit trying to lay the responsibility of raising your children on the schools. That is what parents are for. Parent, from the Latin parentim, literally meaning "to bring forth."
Posted by: adolf Location: new germany on Sep 3, 2008 at 09:21 AM
yes...we can once again begin the fine art of book burning...after all who thinks if you don't like it don't read it
Posted by: rp Location: Calera on Sep 3, 2008 at 09:18 AM
You know I agree that parents should be more aware of what is going on with their childrens school work but you would kind of think that the administration and teachers would be more aware of what they are bringing into their schools. They are the ones that are the educators or are supposed to be.
Posted by: here Location: gone on Sep 3, 2008 at 09:18 AM
Well I agree with the mother but what she needs to do is prepare her child for what is coming to her very soon in life. I answer any questions my kids have and the book well if its on the school reading list maybe the principal needs to scam over the book and make sure its a book a 13 yr old needs to read and take it off the list if its not.
Posted by: A Fellow School Librarian Location: Southern Oklahoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 08:52 AM
Most libraries, including school libraries, have a board approved selection policy which includes guidelines for material acquisitions as well as guidelines for the reconsideration and removal of materials. My question is: Did this mother go through proper procedure to have the book removed? Or did she go straight to the local news without giving the librarian and school administration the chance to quietly rectify the situation?
Posted by: Fozzy Location: Ardmore on Sep 3, 2008 at 08:39 AM
While the book should have been at the high school.. there really isn't anything untruthful in the book. this isn't middle school material.
Posted by: Jennifer Location: Parenthood on Sep 3, 2008 at 08:28 AM
I read the same books my son reads. Not only does it give us a subject for conversation, but I also know what he is reading. This is not rocket-science. I seriously doubt that the school knew what was in that particular book, it's likely that they don't make the recommended reading list themselves either. Don't blame the school. They are doing their best, with very little help from parents.
Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 3, 2008 at 07:56 AM
Where can I find a copy.
Posted by: willie Location: ARDMORE on Sep 3, 2008 at 06:59 AM
Did Mrs. Davis contact the principal? I am sure he would have checked into the situation and taken care of it. He is a good christian man and I am positive that is was just as shocked as she was. To many people try and go through the media to draw attention to themselves instead of going to the easiest solution. I'm sorry that the Davis girl read what was in that book but I'm even more sorry that her mother has splashed it all over the news.
Posted by: SO WHAT Location: denison on Sep 3, 2008 at 06:38 AM
It aint as bad as that rap you people let your kids listen to.
Posted by: jenny lou Location: lake texoma on Sep 3, 2008 at 06:25 AM
GOOD FOR YOU MOM FOR TAKING TIME TO CHECK IT OUT AND FOR BRINGING IT TO THE PUBLICS ATTENTION. WISH MORE PARENTS WOULD GET INVOLVED.
Posted by: appalled on Sep 3, 2008 at 06:19 AM
It's nice to see the parent went through the correct steps (sarcasm intended). To have a book removed from a library you must contact the school and fill out a packet (not the local news). Momma just wanted a moment of fame for her family I guess. Did she even talk to the school before contacting the media??? A book doesn't need to be banned just because a few people don't like it. You can choose what your child reads, but you don't have the right to keep others from seeing the book regardless of its topic. Middle school students are seeing AND doing far worse than what is written in the pages of this novel. And what they are seeing on channel 12's prime time line up shows this and worse. But I'm guessing this child doesn't watch any tv or movies either.
Posted by: Adult Location: living in the real world on Sep 3, 2008 at 03:59 AM
A 13 year old girl and she isn't IMing, shocked by vulgar speech that imitates her peers? Sounds so quaint, so "Leave it to Beaver". Reminds me of the vulgar speech in "Catcher in the Rye" that I read as a kid. Shocking! Burned in many places I hear. Yes, keep up with what your kids are reading, discuss it with them, give them some direction but let them choose/think for themselves; part of becoming an adult. I'd think that mom would be proud that her daughter felt close enough to bring it to her and start a dialogue. Leave it on the shelf, maybe some other mom can discuss it with her daughter too.
Posted by: Republican in Ardmore Location: Ardmore on Sep 3, 2008 at 02:22 AM
Fire the librarian for putting smut on the library shelves!
Posted by: nobody Location: All Over on Sep 2, 2008 at 11:08 PM
What's new??? At least ONE parent is LOOKING at what their child is reading!!!!KUDOS!! Come on AMERICA & look at what your children (not key'udds) are doing and reading. It's way past time to WAKE up!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Alex Location: Durant on Sep 2, 2008 at 10:37 PM
It was on New York Times best selling childrens chapter books list. Thats probably how it got on the recommended reading list..
Posted by: your friend Location: Texas on Sep 2, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Only in Oklahoma
Posted by: Mom in OK Location: OK on Sep 2, 2008 at 09:20 PM
I too am the mother of a 13 yr old. A permission slip for or against books that the teachers "may not agree with" , "may contain graphic language" etc. but in the end the teachers felt that the pros would outweigh the cons of reading such books disclaimer attached by said teachers.... HMMMM I thought, NO WAY. My daughter will only be allowed/required to read books from the school library. (I'll be sure to scan any books she brings home.) What is wrong with our school systems? teachers? Is it any wonder that there seems to be another "teen pregnancy" epidemic or is that just in rural schools? It's like okay kids, lets throw academics out the window and learn to be degenerates.
Posted by: realist Location: everywhere on Sep 2, 2008 at 08:49 PM
was it fact
Posted by: me Location: texas on Sep 2, 2008 at 08:07 PM
So...Who is responsible for ordering/purchasing/reviewing these books BEFORE putting them on the shelves???
Posted by: So What Location: denison on Sep 2, 2008 at 07:40 PM
Still aint as bad as that dang Yo mtv raps and rap. I bet the mom let's her watch and listen to that.
Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 2, 2008 at 07:39 PM
Ta-Ta for now, this should never had enter a school PERIOD!!! What in the world would this school have this book in this library in the first place, I know why my kids go to a school that I know what is in their library
AP Video on KXII
 
Home - News - Weather - First News AM - Sports - Sports Blog - Schools - Production -
DTV Transition - First Alert - Recipes - Community - Entertainment - Lottery - Health - KXII2go - Local Gas Prices -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - EEO Statement - FCC Form 388
Gray Television, Inc. - Copyright © 2002-2008 - Designed and Powered by Clickability